You are browsing the archive for Philosophical.

by Admin

Interpersonal Medical Ethics

3:01 pm in News, Philosophical by Admin

Jan 1, 2003
By: Siobhan Reynolds
Painreliefnetwork.org


The prospect of unfettered access to pain relief excites our deep-seated fear that to allow more doctors to prescribe more medications, we run the risk of getting more people addicted to prescription drugs. Since many families have suffered because one or more of their loved ones have found themselves “lost” in medications or alcohol, instead of happily engaged in more productive and wholesome pursuits, it is important to reflect upon what choosing pain care will mean for our society.


What we must come to understand as a society, if we want available pain care for the seriously ill, is that this decision requires us to hold ourselves and our family members, rather than doctors or substances, individually responsible for our destructive actions. We will have to stop relying on the convenient and ever-present excuse of drug or alcohol addiction that we routinely use to absolve ourselves of personal responsibility.


We will also be forced to forego the notion that jail or any kind of police coercion is a helpful and necessary addition to the treatment of addiction. As a disease state, it is properly treated by physicians, not the penal system.


I say all of this because it is impossible to provide pain care to people who need it, as long as doctors go to jail for mistakenly giving pain medication to addicts. It simply will not happen. Because a doctor cannot tell the difference, and, as recent developments have shown, the law enforcement community can’t either, we will have to abandon our punitive approach to addiction, and will instead be forced to decriminalize and re-medicalize the diagnosis of addiction. That is, if we want pain care for the sick and dying.


We will also have to insist that our community members be responsible to themselves and to their family members for the (sometimes sorry) state they find their lives in. And we, as a newly responsible society, will need to provide support and medical care to those unfortunate members of our community who find themselves more interested in drugs (legal or not), than they are in their friends, families or work.


As it stands, we are allowing our punitive approach to addiction to determine the future course of our country, which, if we were thinking rationally and responsibly about this problem, we would chose to take another way. We now have a prison population of more than two million people, more than any other country in the world. Our proud Federal court system, once a bastion of due process, renowned throughout the world, is engaging in little more than show justice. Racial tensions are growing ever more pronounced. Street drugs are in plentiful supply and increasingly potent. We have created and perpetuated a criminal underworld that subverts democracy and security everywhere. And we are unable to care for our sick and dying because we have fixated obsessively upon punishing addicts and controlling access, rather than treating addiction seriously and responsibly, and likewise living up to our fundamental civil obligation to treat our sick and dying with as much sobriety and tenderness as we can muster.


We flatter ourselves as Americans when we think that by being harsh and obsessive, we are acting responsibly. We need to look at the results of our actions to accurately judge the quality of our remedies. We musn’t reflexively reject the sane and obvious solution, in order to pronounce ourselves beyond reproach.


When we hold ourselves responsible for our destructive behavior, we open up the possibility for growth, for advancement- for the person “lost” in the medicine or the alcohol -to begin to wake up to his or her life’s possibilities.


Life is a great gift, a gift that is properly cherished and lived to the fullest, with meaning and purpose. One hopes to always move toward a greater and deeper understanding of its complexities, its mysteries, and the suffering of others. Our situation requires us to have more faith in life’s intrinsic draw, to trust that people want to live.


Those people, for whom life in a drug or alcohol haze is truly preferable to all of life’s possibilities, those people live in an unspeakable hell on earth. We do not bring anyone to any better place by compounding their misery. Nor do we solve anything by withholding needed pain care from the sick and the dying.


We need to come together as people who are trying to get by, as best we can, and to love and honor each other along the way.


by Admin

Chronic Pain FAQ

2:54 pm in News, Philosophical by Admin

Jan 1, 2003
By: Various
Painreliefnetwork.org


Q. What is chronic pain?
A. Chronic pain is a progressive disease state of the nervous system caused by the overloading of the body’s natural pain control systems. The disease is accompanied by changes in the chemical and anatomical makeup of the spinal cord. Chronic pain is a malignancy. When it goes untreated it increases in intensity and spreads to areas of the body previously unaffected, damaging the sufferer’s health and functioning.Q. Why treat chronic pain with opioids?
A. Opioids are produced by the body’s natural pain control system. Commonly known as endorphins, these substances work in concert with receptors in our brain to deal with painful stimuli. Chronic pain is the condition where our body does not produce enough endorphins to cope with our pain levels and needs to be supplemented with pharmaceutical opioids. Opioid therapy for chronic pain is, in essence, replacement endorphin therapy.


Q. Doctors mostly ignore my chronic pain. Shouldn’t I just learn to live with it?
A. Doctors ignore your chronic pain for reasons that have nothing to do with the seriousness of your condition. Untreated chronic pain will damage your health and cause you to develop multiple health problems. Inactivity due to ongoing pain will lead to increased incidence of hypertension, heart disease, breathing disorders, cancer, and diabetes. If the disease is untreated in its most serious form, untreated chronic pain leads to suicide.


Q. Doctors have told me that if I have to take pain medications every day I must be an addict.
A. They tell you that because if they continue to treat you with opioid pain medications for more than a month or two, they subject themselves to criminal sanction and regulatory scrutiny. Since law enforcement currently regulates medicine in this vital area, doctors are not free to treat pain appropriately. Rather than face the fact that the police and prosecutors do not defer to medical judgment in this important area of medicine, doctors for the most part, prefer to pretend that you and other chronic pain suffers simply do not exist. This is why your doctor labels you an addict.


Q. My family also thinks I am an addict because I constantly need more pills than the doctor will give me. The doctor told my family that I am exhibiting drug-seeking behavior.
A. In addition to perverting the doctor-patient relationship, law enforcement control of medicine has had the effect of turning families against their ill loved ones and pharmacists against their customers. Official pressure and propaganda has been applied to our society through “Just say no” campaigns for over thirty years. It is difficult to think clearly when we have all been subjected to so much bad information at every level of our society. Try to be firm but loving with your family and educate them on chronic pain. Remind them that they have bodies too and could one day be in pain themselves. You might not be able to find adequate pain-relief but you should try to bring your family members around to a more sympathetic attitude toward you and your illness.


Q. Why are there so many pain clinics that don’t really treat pain?
A. Because not treating pain is law enforcement’s preferred approach to pain treatment. Many clinics offer temporary blocks, physical therapy, behavior modification and other techniques. If the clinic refuses to consider opioid therapy to treat your chronic pain, they aren’t up to date in pain management. Continue your search for state-of-the-art pain care.


Q. My doctor won’t give me pain pills but is only offering me an intrathecal pump, that will be surgically implanted in my spinal cord. I’ve read that there are risks with these pumps. What do I do?
A. Your doctor has you over a barrel. If you refuse the pump and switch doctors you may be labeled a doctor shopper. It’s up to you. All patients in pain find themselves coerced into unnecessarily painful and invasive procedures by health care professionals. This is one of the many dangerous side effects of law enforcement control over medicine.


by Admin

Opioids FAQ

2:46 pm in News, Philosophical by Admin

Jan 1, 2003
By: Various
Painreliefnetwork.org


Q. Are opioid pain medications dangerous?
A. No. They are the safest medications a doctor can prescribe. They are not toxic to organ systems and they closely resemble the opioids already present in our bodies, which control pain naturally, so they can safely be taken for a lifetime, if necessary.


Q. Are opioid pain medications addictive?
A. Opioid addiction in chronic pain patients is extremely rare. Addiction is a complex neuropsychological disorder that cannot be caused by a substance. Just as over-eating is not caused by food, so opioid addiction is not caused by opioids.


Q. What if I have a previous history with substance abuse, but I have chronic pain? Will I become addicted?
A. Studies at Harvard Medical School and the University of Wisconsin indicate that a prior history of substance abuse has little predictive value for the failure or success of opioid therapy. You and your doctor will need to watch your reaction to opioids more carefully than a patient without a prior history of substance abuse, but you need not suffer untreated pain.


Q. What if I become pregnant while using opioids?
A. Of all the alternatives available, opioids are safest for mother and child. Because opioid pain medications so closely resemble opioids that naturally occur in our bodies, the fetus is not endangered by them. Recent studies have shown, however that over the counter pain medications such as Advil and aspirin can cause women to miscarry 50% more than women who don’t take them.


Q. What if I have other conditions, like heart diseases, kidney failure, or diabetes, along with pain? Won’t opioids be too heavy for me to take?
A. No. Opioids are the first choice for pain that occurs with other organ system problems. Because they are non-toxic, they are ideal for people with multiple health problems.


Q. If opioids are so safe, why are doctors so reluctant to prescribe them?
A. Because the U.S. Government classifies opioids as dangerous and highly addictive and prosecutes doctors who prescribe them to patients.


Q. Why is there so much talk about multi-modal approaches and not about opioids?
A. Health care professionals have been trying to get treatment to you and have gone along with this approach in order to get you your opioids. Unfortunately, many people cannot afford multiple therapies and so are denied opioids as well.


Q. My doctor will only prescribe Non Steroidal Anti-inflammatories (NSAIDS) for my pain. Is this safe?
A. No. NSAIDS account for 16,500 deaths in the U.S. per year. Since the U.S. Government classifies NSAIDS as non-abusable and not highly addictive, the doctor does not fear prosecution for prescribing them.


Q. I have neuropathic pain. My doctor says neuropathic pain is not responsive to opioids so he prescribes Neurontin. Is this safe?
A. Neurontin is an anti-epileptic, and has many serious side effects. Opioids have been shown to be safe and effective for neuropathic pain, just not in the low doses physicians feel comfortable prescribing for you.


by Admin

PRN’s Clinical Litigation Project

10:50 am in News, Philosophical, Political, U.S. DOJ vs. Medicine by Admin

Introduction
Article III of the US Constitution grants the Courts the power to say what the law is (see Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)). It is settled constitutional law that the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments permit the Courts to interpret the word “liberty,” and it is black-letter law that “liberty” means more than mere freedom from physical restraint. Therefore, the Courts have developed the doctrine of substantive due process — a doctrine which states that the Courts, through their power to interpret the word “liberty” (which appears explicitly in both Due Process Clauses), have the power to review the substance of state and federal action, not merely the manner in which the action is implemented. Therefore, under the doctrine of substantive due process, the Court can invalidate the substance of actions taken by the other two branches of the government.
Phase I
PRN was formed to come to understand the root causes of the severe shortage of opioid pain treatment in the United States, despite its almost universal acceptance as the treatment of choice for severe pain. Ostensibly, the treatment of pain with Controlled Substances was and is legal, and, as the DEA will oft repeat, doctors have nothing to fear if they prescribe these medicines in the normal course of their professional practices. The truth of what was happening to doctors who actually treated pain with opioids, however, only became apparent, when we began to study the criminal trials of physicians, charged under the CSA, and work with the attorneys involved that we were able to piece together the outrageous distortions and dirty tricks government prosecutors were using in order to procure convictions. Ever since, we have provided the lawyers on these cases with our best insights into how the government misleads the judge and jury alike. As of yet attorneys have not been able to secure a total victory for even the most obviously innocent physician if he or she was charged federally. However, we were able secure an important victory for Dr. Paul Heberle in his battle with the state of Pennsylvannia. Since PRN was established we have seen a considerable shift in the government’s willingness to plea bargain with defendants rather than risk a loss at trial. While it is a national disgrace that humane and highly trained physicians are being coerced into lying against themselves in Federal court to avoid draconian sentences, the United States Department of Justice currently enjoys a 99% conviction rate. Moreover, it has become clear to observers at PRN, that the government will stop at nothing to ensure conviction. In this climate, saving one’s self becomes paramount for the pain- treating physician. Accordingly we, and the consultants we work with, have been instrumental in providing counsel crucial ammunition with which to convince the prosecuting attorneys that they might, indeed, have a problem at trial. Many of the physicians who go to prison are elderly and ill: Dr. Freddie Willliams… died in prison. Dr. Paramboleth Edwin… perished of a heart attack just two days after he had lied against himself in a Federal courtroom Dr. Benjamin Moore… a neurologist caught up case against the Comprehensive Care Clinic in South Carolina, hung himself in his mother’s tree after the government conditioned his continued freedom upon providing false testimony against his colleagues. Dr. Michael Woodward… was lured into providing the evidence that damned his colleagues in that same case. — In a landmark case in 2005 the United States Supreme Court ruled favorably in Gonzales vs. Oregon. The decision drew a few boundaries for the United States Justice Department in its enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act as it concerns physicians. But as of yet, the courts have not seen fit to overturn any of the convictions based on the government’s misunderstanding of the scope of their powers prior to the Oregon ruling. The legal filings of the cases in which PRN has played a role may be downloaded from our Clinical Litigation page. Since the beginning of the Ashcroft/Bush crackdown (which commenced right on the heels of 9-11) millions of Americans have been thrown out of care. What little care remains, is provided to patients with suspicion and brutality. This past August, one of the founders of Pain Relief Network, Sean Greenwood, was driven from care and died as a result. Everyday thousands more cower in the fear that their doctor will be next. While it is a common shibboleth that “pain never killed anyone” it is becoming abundantly clear that the non-treatment of pain is killing millions. (See our article: Pain Killer)
Phase II
At PRN, we have refocused our efforts to bring together a legal campaign that will directly overturn the Controlled Substances Act in its entirety. It has become apparent that the law is structurally flawed and denies both patients and physicians substantive due process. PRN will be working towards the day that law, order, compassion and civility due every human being are restored. In the name of protecting us from our doctors, and ourselves, the government has become a brutal enforcer of this deadly oppression and it must be stopped.
  • Siobhan Reynolds, RIP
  • The End of PRN
  • Media
  • Editorials
  • Medical
  • News
  • Philosophical
  • Political
  • Press Releases
  • U.S. DOJ vs. Medicine
  • Uncategorized
  • Victims Speaking Out
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1997