<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Pain Relief Network &#187; Political</title>
	<atom:link href="http://painreliefnetwork.org/category/political/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://painreliefnetwork.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 23:18:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chilling Her Softly</title>
		<link>http://painreliefnetwork.org/chilling-her-softly.php/</link>
		<comments>http://painreliefnetwork.org/chilling-her-softly.php/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 20:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tami</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painreliefnetwork.org/?p=2449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium">The secret silencing of a pain treatment activist</span></strong></p><br />
<p>Nov 17, 2010</p><br />
<p>Jacob Sullum</p><br />
<p>By publicly <a href="http://reason.com/archives/2009/09/09/drug-control-becomes-speech-co"><span style="text-decoration: underline"><span style="color: #0000ff">defending</span></span></a> Stephen and Linda Schneider, a Kansas doctor and nurse accused of running a &#8220;pill mill,&#8221; pain treatment activist Siobhan Reynolds irked the prosecutor&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://painreliefnetwork.org/chilling-her-softly.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on the Siobhan Reynolds Case</title>
		<link>http://painreliefnetwork.org/more-on-the-siobhan-reynolds-case.php/</link>
		<comments>http://painreliefnetwork.org/more-on-the-siobhan-reynolds-case.php/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tami</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painreliefnetwork.org/?p=2439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Nov 3, 2010<br />
By: David Rittgers<br />
Cato</p><br />
<p>Building on Ilya Shapiro’s <a href="http://painreliefnetwork.org/court-enforces-secrecy-about-constitutional-abuses/" class="broken_link"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="color: #0000ff;">post</span></span></a> on the sealed grand jury proceedings against Siobhan Reynolds, founder of the Pain Relief Network, and the sealed Reason Foundation/Institute for Justice amicus brief, here&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://painreliefnetwork.org/more-on-the-siobhan-reynolds-case.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outspoken Activist’s Case Becomes Tangled in Secrets</title>
		<link>http://painreliefnetwork.org/outspoken-activist%e2%80%99s-case-becomes-tangled-in-secrets.php/</link>
		<comments>http://painreliefnetwork.org/outspoken-activist%e2%80%99s-case-becomes-tangled-in-secrets.php/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tami</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. DOJ vs. Medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painreliefnetwork.org/?p=2434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Adam Liptak<br />
Nov 1, 2010<br />
The New York Times</p><br />
<p>Last week, I asked a lawyer from a libertarian group for a copy of a brief it had filed in a First Amendment case. Sounding frustrated and incredulous,&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://painreliefnetwork.org/outspoken-activist%e2%80%99s-case-becomes-tangled-in-secrets.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A First Amendment Case You Can&#8217;t Talk About</title>
		<link>http://painreliefnetwork.org/a-first-amendment-case-you-cant-talk-about.php/</link>
		<comments>http://painreliefnetwork.org/a-first-amendment-case-you-cant-talk-about.php/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tami</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painreliefnetwork.org/?p=2427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Oct 28, 2010<br />
By: Jacob Sullum<br />
Reason.com</p><br />
<p>Last week Kansas physician Stephen Schneider and his wife, Linda, who worked as a nurse in his practice, were <a href="http://www.kansascity.com/2010/10/20/2336664/couple-get-long-prison-terms-for.html" class="broken_link">sentenced</a> to 30 and 33 years, respectively, for painkiller prescriptions the&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://painreliefnetwork.org/a-first-amendment-case-you-cant-talk-about.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advocate Appeals Secret Kan. Case To Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://painreliefnetwork.org/advocate-appeals-secret-kan-case-to-supreme-court.php/</link>
		<comments>http://painreliefnetwork.org/advocate-appeals-secret-kan-case-to-supreme-court.php/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tami</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painreliefnetwork.org/?p=2422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>Oct 27, 2010</div>
<div>WICHITA, Kan.</div>
<div>The Associated Press</div>
<p></p><br />
<p></p><br />
<p>An advocate for chronic pain patients who is under investigation for obstruction of justice has challenged grand jury subpoenas in a rare case that climbed secretly through the judicial system&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://painreliefnetwork.org/advocate-appeals-secret-kan-case-to-supreme-court.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court refuses request for open filings</title>
		<link>http://painreliefnetwork.org/court-refuses-request-for-open-filings.php/</link>
		<comments>http://painreliefnetwork.org/court-refuses-request-for-open-filings.php/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tami</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painreliefnetwork.org/?p=2414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Oct 18, 2010</p><br />
<p>Associated Press</p><br />
<p>WASHINGTON (AP) &#8212; The Supreme Court has turned down a request to make public a national patient advocate&#8217;s appeal in the case of a Kansas doctor linked to dozens of patient overdose deaths.</p><br />
<p>The court&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://painreliefnetwork.org/court-refuses-request-for-open-filings.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reporters Committee Petitions Supreme Court To Intervene In Grand Jury-Related Case</title>
		<link>http://painreliefnetwork.org/reporters-committee-petitions-supreme-court-to-intervene-in-grand-jury-related-case.php/</link>
		<comments>http://painreliefnetwork.org/reporters-committee-petitions-supreme-court-to-intervene-in-grand-jury-related-case.php/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 23:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tami</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painreliefnetwork.org/?p=2410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> </p><br />
<p>Oct 08, 2010</p><br />
<p>by Marcia Coyle</p><br />
<p>The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, in an unusual step, has asked the U.S. Supreme Court for permission to intervene in a pending grand jury-related case in order to oppose the&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://painreliefnetwork.org/reporters-committee-petitions-supreme-court-to-intervene-in-grand-jury-related-case.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Constitution of the United States</title>
		<link>http://painreliefnetwork.org/the-constitution-of-the-united-states.php/</link>
		<comments>http://painreliefnetwork.org/the-constitution-of-the-united-states.php/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painreliefnetwork.org/?p=2323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p><br />
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://painreliefnetwork.org/the-constitution-of-the-united-states.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRN&#8217;s Clinical Litigation Project</title>
		<link>http://painreliefnetwork.org/prn%e2%80%99s-clinical-litigation-project.php/</link>
		<comments>http://painreliefnetwork.org/prn%e2%80%99s-clinical-litigation-project.php/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. DOJ vs. Medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.painreliefnetwork.org/newsite/prn/prn%e2%80%99s-clinical-litigation-project.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Introduction </strong></div>
<div></div>
<div>Article III of the US Constitution grants the Courts the power to say what the law is (see Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)). It is settled constitutional law that the Due Process Clauses of the</div><p>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://painreliefnetwork.org/prn%e2%80%99s-clinical-litigation-project.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

